All about Margaret Hodge

March 27, 2011

The coming storm!

Filed under: Uncategorized — Patrick Harrington @ 12:59 pm
Tags: , , , ,

DO YOU run a web-site or have a blog site?  Do you have a Face Book or Twitter account?  If so, get in touch with us today!
The team that research and write this All about Margaret Hodge site and the Barking and Dagenham Sentinel have big plans for the future.  But we need your help.
During last years General Election, the contents of this site – and the Sentinel – were featured and discussed on many sites.  But the establishment media ensured a complete news black out by refusing to report our revelations about Hodge.
Would this have happened with any other parliamentary candidate?  Imagine any other candidate with as much baggage as Hodge – they’d never be off the front pages.  Yet there wasn’t a peep from the capitalist press.  Why not?  (Maybe that’s a question for later.  No doubt everyone would have their own pet theory about that one).
In the meantime, we need to devise a strategy that helps us circumvent any future news blackout.  That’s why we need your help.
Margaret Hodge is just one of many MPs who we’d like to take a closer look at.  It’s our opinion that many of Britain’s MPs aren’t fit to shine the boots of their constituents – let alone ‘represent’ them at Westminster.  They need to be exposed as well.
Just a very small team of volunteer researchers and writers have produced this site and the Barking and Dagenham Sentinel. Yet look at how we’ve been able to expose her many failings.  For instance, we’ve revealed that:

 

  • She’s a ‘socialist’ MP who also happens to be a member of the fabulously wealthy Oppenheimer family.  That’s why her nick-name is ‘Loads of Money’.
  • Before she became MP for Barking in East London she was Labour leader of Islington Borough Council in North London.  He she sported a bust of Lenin and flew the red flag over the town hall.
  • Whilst in charge at Islington, she ignored social workers who warned her about the sexual abuse of children in Islington Council Care.
  • She backed government plans to trespass upon personal privacy, enhanced the power of the burgeoning database state and helped compromise our hard-won civil liberties.
  • She voted for war against Iraq.  To date, nearly 200 UK troops have been killed there.  She has their blood on her hands.

 

If we can produce all this with a few volunteers and very limited resources, just think what we could do if we had more researchers and writers.  And just think what we could achieve if we had a network of web masters and bloggers who’d be able spread the word.
That’s where you come in.
First of all, we’d like your help in tracking down more info about Margaret Hodge.  The more people looking, the more we’re likely to find.
Secondly, we’d also like to feature more on her running mate, Jon Cruddas.  He’s the Labour MP for Dagenham and Rainham.  He’s also a ‘socialist’ but he has two homes – one an upmarket flat in a Notting Hill mansion-block.  Doesn’t he deserve to be exposed to the same degree as we’ve exposed Hodge?
Thirdly, we’ve already mentioned that we’d also like to take a look at other MPs.  What about the one who represents your area?  Are they a liar and hypocrite?  Should we expose them as well?
To help us out, send us details of your web-site or blog.  Also contact us if you have access to Face Book or a Twitter account.
Every time we produce a new article on, say, Hodge – and there are many, many more to come! – we’ll be able to send it on to you.  You can then re-post it.  This means that increasing numbers of people will be aware of what Hodge, Cruddas and other MPs are up to.
You’ll be continually updated with more and more info about the MPs we’re looking into.  And the more current information your site or blog carries the more likely people are going to visit you.
We’ll also feature articles on all those sites and blogs that help us out in this way.

Help us expose all lying, cheating MPs.  Help us create such a storm that the establishment media won’t be able to ignore us for much longer.  Contact us by e-mail: allabout@hushmail.com (Please don’t forget to include source material).

February 28, 2011

Cruddas revisited

Filed under: Cruddas,Expenses scandal — Patrick Harrington @ 4:10 pm
Tags: , , , , ,

IF YOU’RE anything like us you’re probably a little bit tired of listening to all of the lies that Margaret Hodge peddles.  We’re certainly a little bit tired looking at The Battle for Barking documentary (1) and trying to find anything to substantiate them.
As we’ve already noted, Margaret Hodge claimed that Nick Griffin, the British National Party leader, was standing against her (to become MP for Barking) because “he hates women, he hates Jews and he hates immigrants and I’m all of them.”
So far, we’ve looked at her claims that Mr. Griffin ‘hates’ women (2) and that he ‘hates’ Jews (3).  To date, we haven’t located any articles written by him or interviews given by him that would support her claims.
We’re still to examine her claims that he ‘hates’ immigrants.  However, we’re beginning to get the feeling that’ll be a wild goose chase as well.  Nevertheless, we’ll bring you that article in the not too distant future.
With this in mind, we thought we’d turn our attention back to Jon Cruddas for a while.
Cruddas is Hodge’s Labour Party running mate in this area of outer East London/inner Essex.  Some of you might have heard him on the news (4) recently moaning about the “real threat of a new potent political constituency built around an assertive English nationalism”.
We’ve also received some new information on Cruddas from one of our researchers.  But before we reveal all in a future article, we thought that we’d remind everyone about Cruddas.
So who is he – and what does he represent?
Jon Cruddas is the MP for the constituency of Dagenham and Rainham.  (Hodge represents Barking and Dagenham).  It was created by the Boundary Commission for England by merging the majority of the former constituencies of Dagenham and Hornchurch.  Following a review of ward boundaries a small part of River ward was also transferred from Barking. (5)
According to his own web-site he “is the Member of Parliament for Dagenham and Rainham. He was first elected in 2001 to the seat of Dagenham. Jon was born in Helston, and was educated at the Oaklands Catholic Comprehensive School in Waterlooville, near Portsmouth, before attending the University of Warwick where he qualified with an M.A. and later a Ph.D. in Philosophy.”  (6)
(He earned his Ph.D by producing a thesis entitled An analysis of value theory, the sphere of production and contemporary approaches to the reorganisation of workplace relations.  He was a visiting fellow at the University of Wisconsin-Madison (7) for a year from 1987).
It’s interesting to note that Mr. Cruddas studied Philosophy at university – for his philosophy seems to us to be to rub the noses of his constituents right in the mud.
As we’ve noted before (8) he claims to be real Labour – as opposed to Nu Labour – and thus a real socialist.
Indeed, his web-site talks up his working-class street cred:
“After the 1997 general election, he became the deputy political secretary to the new Prime Minister, Tony Blair, and as the link between the Prime Minister and the trade unions, he worked heavily on the introduction of the National Minimum Wage.”
This is all fine and dandy, but it doesn’t explain away the fact that he has TWO homes!
For he has one in Dagenham – around this time last year it was thought to be worth about £180,000 – and an upmarket flat in a Notting Hill mansion-block.  Again, last year flats in this area were worth up to £900,000.
And as the Barking and Dagenham Sentinel (9) noted last year:
“Now, what property do you think that Cruddas has been claiming his second-home expenses on?
Yes, you’ve guessed it – the flat in Notting Hill!”
The Sentinel also revealed that he has “hovered up more than £86,000 in the so-called Additional Costs Allowance (ACA) since 2004″.

It’s just as well that he’s a good ‘socialist’ MP – we’d dread to think how he‘d behave if he was an unscrupulous capitalist.

(1)  http://www.channel4.com/programmes/the-battle-for-barking/4od#3150944
(2)  http://margarethodge.net/2011/02/13/liar-liar-part-1/
(3)  http://margarethodge.net/2011/02/20/liar-liar-part2/
(4)  http://www.metro.co.uk/news/856685-half-of-britons-open-to-backing-far-right-political-party
(5)  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dagenham_and_Rainham_%28UK_Parliament_constituency%29
(6)  http://www.joncruddas.org.uk/index.php/pages/about_jon/
(7)  http://www.wisc.edu/
(8)  http://margarethodge.net/category/cruddas/
(9)  http://margarethodge.files.wordpress.com/2010/05/sentinel.pdf

February 20, 2011

Liar, Liar! (Part2)

Filed under: Battle for Barking — Patrick Harrington @ 5:20 pm
Tags: , , , ,

 HANDS UP anyone who has heard of Pinocchio? 

 For those who don’t know, he was the creation of Carlo Collodi, an Italian children’s writer.  The Adventures of Pinocchio was probably his most famous book.  In it, Pinocchio – a wooden puppet carved by Geppetto – dreams of being a real boy.  So far, so good.  However, the peculiar thing about Pinocchio was that every time he told a lie his nose grew longer. (1)

So how does this relate to Margaret Hodge?  Well, let’s just say that if she was appearing in The Battle for Barking (2) as Pinocchio, she’d be able to put your eye out at a hundred paces!

As we’ve noted already, Hodge seems to be an out-and-out liar (3).   Her first big lies comes just around a minute and a half into the film when she declares that Nick Griffin “hates women, he hates Jews and he hates immigrants and I’m all of them.”

In our previous article Liar, Liar! (Part 1) we proved that Hodge lied about Nick Griffin ‘hating’ women.  We’ll now move on to her allegation that he ‘hates Jews’.

We’ve looked at Laura Fairrie’s film again and didn’t come across anything that was said during the election campaign that indicated that he was anti-Jewish. 

Neither did we see – or hear – anything in the run up to the election that would indicate this. 

Can anyone show us one piece of official BNP literature – or point us to just one interview – in which he says that he ‘hates Jews’?  Neither are we aware of anything like this being produced just before or during the General Election.  Are you?

 So where did Margaret Hodge get her information from?  Surely as a responsible Member of Parliament – indeed an ex-Minister – she wouldn’t tell porkies.  Would she? 

One would have thought that Hodge would have been aware of the BNP’s position on Israel.  After all, she has enough advisors! 

So the question remains – why did she state that Nick Griffin ‘hates Jews’?

Ironically, the only person who commented on her race/ethnicity/religion was Hodge herself!  (We understand that it was mentioned on a couple of web-based discussion groups – but that’s another story.  However, keep your eyes peeled because we’ll be commenting on this in a future article).

And we’re not the only ones who noticed that the only person who mentioned Jews during the Barking election was Hodge herself. 

In his article The Battle for Barking (More 4 30/11/10) Reviewed (4), Larry O’Hara notes:

“Hodge’s most telling evasiveness came in an exchange with a BNP supporter as she was getting into a 4×4 vehicle.  He upbraided her for being a millionairess, one of those “thieving MPs” and having ignored paedophiles (an obvious reference to her tenure at Islington Council where she disgracefully swept allegations of child abuse in council-run children’s homes under the carpet).  Her response was to ignore these points, but to say “and you dislike me because I’m Jewish”.  As a BNP activist, he may well have been anti-semitic, so she might have a point–however (unlike him as far as I could see) Hodge deliberately racialised the encounter (as with the mixed-race couple earlier) to avoid addressing the arguments.”

Mr. O’Hara is an anti-fascist campaigner, so he’s hardly likely to side with Nick Griffin or the British National Party.  Yet he notes that Hodge plays the anti-Jewish card here.

As this appears to be the only time Jews are mentioned, we’ve looked at this incident again.  You should too – fast forward the film to about 1 hour 16 minutes.  Here you’ll see a British National Party election worker who’s expressing the anger and frustration felt by ordinary English working folks. 

The BNP worker is a straight-talking Cockney.  He doesn’t look like the type of person who’s liable to mince his words.  In terms of race, ethnic origin or religion, he had the opportunity to call Hodge everything under the sun.  Yet he just makes mention of her German background.  Once again, Hodge was the only one to mention Jews.

So much for Margaret Hodge’s claim that Mr. Griffin ‘hates Jews’. 

Just like her first statement (that he ‘hates women’) a simple little research is all that’s needed to blow this lie right out of the water!

(1)  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pinocchio

(2)  http://www.channel4.com/programmes/the-battle-for-barking/4od#3150944

(3)  http://margarethodge.net/2011/02/13/liar-liar-part-1/

(4)  http://www.borderland.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=214:the-battle-for-barking-more-4-301110-reviewed&catid=46:journalism-spij-watch

February 13, 2011

Liar, Liar! (Part 1)

Filed under: Battle for Barking — Patrick Harrington @ 10:39 am
Tags: , , , , , ,

THEY SAY that if you’re going to tell a lie, then it might as well be a big one.  And boy, does Hodge tell lies.  She tells absolute whoppers!  In fact, she tells so many lies that we’re going to have to look at them one at a time.

At the very beginning of Laura Fairrie’s film The Battle for Barking (1) Hodge is asked why Nick Griffin, the British National Party leader, is standing against her.  She answers “Because he hates women, he hates Jews and he hates immigrants and I’m all of them.”

She’s allowed to make this fantastic claim without backing it up.  At no time does she offer any evidence for such a sweeping statement.  The film doesn’t show Mr. Griffin saying anything remotely like this.

Hodge’s claim that Nick Griffin “hates women” is surprising.  As far as we’re aware, he’s been happily married to his wife Jackie for around 25 years.  Jackie happens to be a woman.  He is also a father of four.  Three of his children are daughters – all of whom happen to be women!

If he “hates women” so much he has a funny way of showing it!

Seriously, however, as far as we’re aware, Mr. Griffin didn’t say – or do – anything during the last General Election that indicated that he hated women.  Indeed, we can’t recall the subject of women per se appearing in any of his election leaflets, posters or political broadcasts.  Can you?

If women were mentioned, it probably would have been in relation to Mr. Griffin’s position on militant Islam. 

It’s well known that he is opposed to the ‘Islamification’ of Britain.  It’s our understanding that Mr. Griffin feels that militant Islam treats women as second-class citizens.  But this would put him in the position of supporting women – and not hating them!

We at All about Margaret Hodge and the Barking and Dagenham Sentinel are a little old-fashioned.  We believe that web-sites, publications and interviews should try to raise standards of debate and provide detailed information, not just soundbites.

We’re about telling the truth.  We seek to inform and let people make up their own mind.  Hodge, on the other hand, seems to rely on lies and misinformation.

(1)  http://www.channel4.com/programmes/the-battle-for-barking/4od#3150944

January 9, 2011

Setting the scene for the Battle for Barking

Filed under: Battle for Barking — Patrick Harrington @ 6:16 pm
Tags:

SOME FOLKS may have seen The Battle for Barking, a thought-provoking film made by Laura Fairrie (1) for Channel 4. Made over the course of a year, it provides a reasonably in-depth look at how events panned out in Barking in relation to the May 2010 General Election. According to Channel 4:

“Long-standing Labour MP Margaret Hodge is a stalwart of the New Labour establishment. Running against her is Nick Griffin, the British National Party leader. Griffin is a controversial figure, with a conviction for inciting racial hatred, who nonetheless commands considerable support. As it chronicles the rise and fall of the far-right BNP, it gives a fascinating insight into the inner workings of the ‘BNP family’ and the working class disillusionment with the Labour party that fuelled the BNP campaign, offering an honest, moving and humorous portrait of a white working class community forced to face the changes brought by new immigrant populations.” (2) Although Hodge got herself re-elected, (3) Fairrie’s work was very interesting. For it revealed a lot of information about Margaret ‘Loads of Money’ Hodge, her inner circle of advisers, and the local Labour Party election machine. In the next few weeks, we’ll be producing a series of articles which will examine Hodge’s character in the light of The Battle for Barking. In particular, we’ll be highlighting the arrogance and hypocrisy of a multi-millionaire ‘Socialist’ who represents one of the poorest areas of the country. (We also hope to look at various other reviews – from right across the political spectrum – of Fairrie’s Channel 4 programme.)

For those who haven’t seen The Battle for Barking you can do so by clicking here: http://www.channel4.com/programmes/the-battle-for-barking/4od#3150944

After watching it, we’d encourage you to re-read this web-site and what The Barking and Dagenham Sentinel (4) had to say about Hodge. Make your own mind about her. Then ask yourself: Is she really the right person to represent this area – and does she deserve your future vote?

 (1) http://www.guardian.co.uk/tv-and-radio/video/2010/nov/30/documentary-documentary

 (2) http://www.channel4.com/programmes/the-battle-for-barking/4od#3150944

 (3) http://margaret-hodge.co.uk/

 (4) http://margarethodge.files.wordpress.com/2010/05/sentinel.pdf

January 7, 2011

Hodge is in the Money – Again!

Filed under: Inthemoney — Patrick Harrington @ 2:13 pm

MARGARET ‘LOADS OF MONEY’ HODGE has been the Labour Member of Parliament for Barking since 1994 (1).  But during this time, she’s been much more than an MP – she’s also held down a couple of high-flying jobs.  For instance, she was the first Minister for Children in 2003 (2) and was Minister of State for Culture and Tourism at the Department for Culture, Media and Sport (3).  (A full list of her public appointments can be found here: http://www.parliament.uk/biographies/margaret-hodge/25573)

As we all know, Gordon Brown’s Labour Party were booted out of office after the General Election of May 2010.  Since then, the vast majority of Labour MPs seem to have kept their heads down.  They appear to be still licking their wounds and concentrating on their constituency work.  Only the members of the Shadow Cabinet have adopted a reasonably high-profile.

However, one of the exceptions to this rule is – yes, you’ve guessed it! – Margaret Hodge.

In case it’s missed your attention, during the middle of last year she was elected to the chair of the Public Accounts Committee (4).  This is a big step for Hodge, because, according to some reports, it is a “plumb role” (5) which is “widely regarded as one of the most influential backbench roles in Parliament.” (6)

According to the official UK Parliament website (7) the Committee of Public Accounts is appointed by the House of Commons to examine “the accounts showing the appropriation of the sums granted to Parliament to meet the public expenditure, and of such other accounts laid before Parliament as the Committee may think fit” (8)

In layman’s terms this means that Hodge is in charge of a committee which scrutinises the spending of government departments and assesses the value for money of major public procurement projects.

At the moment it’s too early to say how she’ll perform in this new role.  However, some commentators have indicated that her “time at the PAC is unlikely to be without incident.” (9)  Maybe it’s a subject we’ll have to return to a few months down the line!

However, when we heard of Hodge’s appointment we couldn’t help thinking how well she has done for herself.  As we all know, she’s not short of a bob or two.  First of all, she’s a millionaire.  Secondly, she also cops a cool £65,000 – her salary as Barking’s MP.  And thirdly – to top it all – she’s landed a top government job which allows her to pocket around £15,000 a year.

It’s just as well she’s a true ‘socialist’ and a member in good standing of the Labour Party.  God knows what sort of money grabber she’d be if she was a Tory and a fanatical supporter of the capitalist system!

 

(1)  http://margaret-hodge.co.uk/?page_id=2

(2)  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minister_for_Children

(3)  http://www.culture.gov.uk/

(4)  http://www.solidaritytradeunion.com/news-mainmenu-52/398-10122010-we-are-all-in-this-together-how-about-these-two

(5)  http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/10283364

(6)  http://www.publicfinance.co.uk/news/2010/06/margaret-hodge-elected-chair-of-public-accounts-committee/

(7)  http://www.parliament.uk/

(8)  http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/public-accounts-committee/role/

(9)  http://www.accountancyage.com/aa/news/1808135/what-prospects-margaret-hodge-pac

 

January 3, 2011

2010 in review

Filed under: Stats — Patrick Harrington @ 1:13 pm

The stats helper monkeys at WordPress.com mulled over how this blog did in 2010, and here’s a high level summary of its overall blog health:

Healthy blog!

The Blog-Health-o-Meter™ reads This blog is on fire!.

Crunchy numbers

Featured image

A Boeing 747-400 passenger jet can hold 416 passengers. This blog was viewed about 4,900 times in 2010. That’s about 12 full 747s.

In 2010, there were 20 new posts, not bad for the first year! There were 12 pictures uploaded, taking up a total of 3mb. That’s about a picture per month.

The busiest day of the year was May 3rd with 289 views. The most popular post that day was Hodge Exposed in Barking and Dagenham Sentinel.

Where did they come from?

The top referring sites in 2010 were thegreenarrow.co.uk, stormfront.org, londonpatriot.org, en.wikipedia.org, and facebook.com.

Some visitors came searching, mostly for margaret hodge, margaret hodge mp, child abuse, margaret hodge expenses, and all about margaret hodge.

May 8, 2010

Did Hodge break electoral law?

Filed under: Electoral irregularities? — Patrick Harrington @ 8:02 pm
Tags: ,

WAS Margaret Hodge so desperate for votes that she broke the law? 

That’s the allegation from some people as it emerged that she has been accused of breaching electoral law.  It’s said that she tried to solicit votes in polling stations whilst voters went to the polls last Thursday.
An agent for the United Kingdom Independence Party  claimed that Hodge had been seen inside at least two polling stations in her Barking constituency.

According to a report  in the Daily Telegraph, UKIP claimed “that Mrs Hodge, the culture minister, had used “undue influence” by speaking to voters inside venues, in proximity to where they were voting”.

UKIP say they will lodge a formal complaint to the returning officer in Barking.

The Labour Party haven’t denied that she was in the polling stations.  However, they claim that she was just saying hello to voters.   

But, Kim Gandy, the agent for UKIP candidate Frank Maloney  said that Hodge was seen at one polling station with Labour leaflets.  Here she was asked to leave. She was then seen inside another polling station talking to voters.

Mrs Gandy said: “You do not do that. You do not go in there and talk to voters. To me it is undue influence.” 

 

May 3, 2010

Conservatives say Barking Labour is in disarray

Filed under: Uncategorized,Views on Margaret Hodge — Patrick Harrington @ 8:27 pm
Tags: , ,

A TORY web-site feels that Labour MP, Margaret ‘Loads of Money’ Hodge could lose her Barking seat.  It has also largely written-off its own candidate there (1).

They were the stark claims made by conservativehome.blogs.com which is edited by Jonathan Isaby and Tim Montgomerie.

It also hints at a split in the Labour Party in Barking.  Whilst this may be wishful thinking (remember they are Tories!), we are aware of a lot of political in-fighting within the Labour Party.

Indeed on March 25 we featured an article – Take care Liam! – which looked at Liam Smith, the leader of Barking and Dagenham council.  Liam made statements to the East London Enquirer, which some have taken to be an implied criticism of Barking MP Margaret Hodge (2).

 Meanwhile the Tory site has this to say about Hodge and the Labour Party in Barking:

 “The Labour Party is in disarray, largely due to the activities of Margaret Hodge who has engineered the de-selection of a number of popular Labour councillors. Many of their hard-core voters are up-in-arms and have indicated that they will no longer support the party …this may well have the effect of a further thinning of the Labour vote.”

The site also notes that the selection of the Tory candidate – Simon Marcus – for Barking took place very late on in the game.  This is “a disadvantage.”  Whilst the site would obviously like the Tory to win, it concedes that “it is not probable.”

The Tory site seems to confirm what other experts have said – that the Barking seat is up for grabs. Margaret Hodge is fighting on a very poor record and even many Labour supporters have shown a reluctance to campaign for her re-election. Principled anti-racists recalling her desperate  BNP-style, populist statements are deserting her to vote for the Greens.

Whilst Hodge is the sitting MP and Barking has been a safe Labour seat for years but it is possible that a political upset of historic proportions could happen.

So who will your money be on?

(1)  http://conservativehome.blogs.com/localgovernment/2010/02/the-conservative-challenge-in-barking-and-dagenham.html

(2)  http://margarethodge.net/2010/03/25/take-care-liam/

List of candidates

  • Dominic Carman, Liberal Democrat
  • Thomas Darwood, Independent
  •  Crucial Chris Dowling, Monster Raving Loony Party
  • Jayne Forbes, Green Party
  • Nick Griffin, British National Party
  • George Hargreaves, Christian Party
  •  Margaret Hodge, Labour *
  • Frank Maloney, UK Independence Party
  • Simon Marcus, Conservative
  • Dapo Sijuwola, The Restoration Party
    * Incumbent MP

Hodge Exposed in Barking and Dagenham Sentinel

Filed under: Anti-Christian,Cruddas,Expenses scandal,Islington Child Abuse Scandal,Labour split,Response to criticism,Views on Margaret Hodge,War record — Patrick Harrington @ 7:13 am
Tags: , , , , , ,

The Barking and Dagenham Sentinel - being delivered free to all homes in Barking – has dealt a crushing blow to the hopes for re-election of Margaret Hodge. Hodge stands revealed for her record on the Iraq war, her expenses claims and her failure to deal with serious child abuse when she was Head of Islington Council. The paper suggests that the ‘hold your nose and vote Labour’ approach would be immoral and inappropriate  in this instance. Many principled anti-racists are rejecting Hodge and instead intend to vote for the Green Party. Other committed Labour supporters are deciding to stay at home as no  genuine, principled Labour candidate is standing in the Constituency.

Please take the time to read this fantastic newspaper exposing the vile Margaret Hodge, MP. I say MP but hopefully after Thursday that wil be ex-MP. 50,000 of the printed edition of this newspaper are going out in Barking and Dagenham. It will certainly make people think there.

We want you to help spread the pdf  of this fantastic newspaper and the link to it around the Internet. You can:-

Save the pdf and send it as an attachment to your e-mail contact list
Post the link on your Facebook wall and Twitter
Post the link to groups and campaigns on Facebook

Get people re-posting and re-sending too. Let’s get this viral and dislodge Hodge!

http://margarethodge.files.wordpress.com/2010/05/sentinel.pdf

Next Page »

Theme: Rubric. Blog at WordPress.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.