All about Margaret Hodge

February 20, 2011

Liar, Liar! (Part2)

Filed under: Battle for Barking — Patrick Harrington @ 5:20 pm
Tags: , , , ,

 HANDS UP anyone who has heard of Pinocchio? 

 For those who don’t know, he was the creation of Carlo Collodi, an Italian children’s writer.  The Adventures of Pinocchio was probably his most famous book.  In it, Pinocchio – a wooden puppet carved by Geppetto – dreams of being a real boy.  So far, so good.  However, the peculiar thing about Pinocchio was that every time he told a lie his nose grew longer. (1)

So how does this relate to Margaret Hodge?  Well, let’s just say that if she was appearing in The Battle for Barking (2) as Pinocchio, she’d be able to put your eye out at a hundred paces!

As we’ve noted already, Hodge seems to be an out-and-out liar (3).   Her first big lies comes just around a minute and a half into the film when she declares that Nick Griffin “hates women, he hates Jews and he hates immigrants and I’m all of them.”

In our previous article Liar, Liar! (Part 1) we proved that Hodge lied about Nick Griffin ‘hating’ women.  We’ll now move on to her allegation that he ‘hates Jews’.

We’ve looked at Laura Fairrie’s film again and didn’t come across anything that was said during the election campaign that indicated that he was anti-Jewish. 

Neither did we see – or hear – anything in the run up to the election that would indicate this. 

Can anyone show us one piece of official BNP literature – or point us to just one interview – in which he says that he ‘hates Jews’?  Neither are we aware of anything like this being produced just before or during the General Election.  Are you?

 So where did Margaret Hodge get her information from?  Surely as a responsible Member of Parliament – indeed an ex-Minister – she wouldn’t tell porkies.  Would she? 

One would have thought that Hodge would have been aware of the BNP’s position on Israel.  After all, she has enough advisors! 

So the question remains – why did she state that Nick Griffin ‘hates Jews’?

Ironically, the only person who commented on her race/ethnicity/religion was Hodge herself!  (We understand that it was mentioned on a couple of web-based discussion groups – but that’s another story.  However, keep your eyes peeled because we’ll be commenting on this in a future article).

And we’re not the only ones who noticed that the only person who mentioned Jews during the Barking election was Hodge herself. 

In his article The Battle for Barking (More 4 30/11/10) Reviewed (4), Larry O’Hara notes:

“Hodge’s most telling evasiveness came in an exchange with a BNP supporter as she was getting into a 4×4 vehicle.  He upbraided her for being a millionairess, one of those “thieving MPs” and having ignored paedophiles (an obvious reference to her tenure at Islington Council where she disgracefully swept allegations of child abuse in council-run children’s homes under the carpet).  Her response was to ignore these points, but to say “and you dislike me because I’m Jewish”.  As a BNP activist, he may well have been anti-semitic, so she might have a point–however (unlike him as far as I could see) Hodge deliberately racialised the encounter (as with the mixed-race couple earlier) to avoid addressing the arguments.”

Mr. O’Hara is an anti-fascist campaigner, so he’s hardly likely to side with Nick Griffin or the British National Party.  Yet he notes that Hodge plays the anti-Jewish card here.

As this appears to be the only time Jews are mentioned, we’ve looked at this incident again.  You should too – fast forward the film to about 1 hour 16 minutes.  Here you’ll see a British National Party election worker who’s expressing the anger and frustration felt by ordinary English working folks. 

The BNP worker is a straight-talking Cockney.  He doesn’t look like the type of person who’s liable to mince his words.  In terms of race, ethnic origin or religion, he had the opportunity to call Hodge everything under the sun.  Yet he just makes mention of her German background.  Once again, Hodge was the only one to mention Jews.

So much for Margaret Hodge’s claim that Mr. Griffin ‘hates Jews’. 

Just like her first statement (that he ‘hates women’) a simple little research is all that’s needed to blow this lie right out of the water!

(1)  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pinocchio

(2)  http://www.channel4.com/programmes/the-battle-for-barking/4od#3150944

(3)  http://margarethodge.net/2011/02/13/liar-liar-part-1/

(4)  http://www.borderland.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=214:the-battle-for-barking-more-4-301110-reviewed&catid=46:journalism-spij-watch

February 13, 2011

Liar, Liar! (Part 1)

THEY SAY that if you’re going to tell a lie, then it might as well be a big one.  And boy, does Hodge tell lies.  She tells absolute whoppers!  In fact, she tells so many lies that we’re going to have to look at them one at a time.

At the very beginning of Laura Fairrie’s film The Battle for Barking (1) Hodge is asked why Nick Griffin, the British National Party leader, is standing against her.  She answers “Because he hates women, he hates Jews and he hates immigrants and I’m all of them.”

She’s allowed to make this fantastic claim without backing it up.  At no time does she offer any evidence for such a sweeping statement.  The film doesn’t show Mr. Griffin saying anything remotely like this.

Hodge’s claim that Nick Griffin “hates women” is surprising.  As far as we’re aware, he’s been happily married to his wife Jackie for around 25 years.  Jackie happens to be a woman.  He is also a father of four.  Three of his children are daughters – all of whom happen to be women!

If he “hates women” so much he has a funny way of showing it!

Seriously, however, as far as we’re aware, Mr. Griffin didn’t say – or do – anything during the last General Election that indicated that he hated women.  Indeed, we can’t recall the subject of women per se appearing in any of his election leaflets, posters or political broadcasts.  Can you?

If women were mentioned, it probably would have been in relation to Mr. Griffin’s position on militant Islam. 

It’s well known that he is opposed to the ‘Islamification’ of Britain.  It’s our understanding that Mr. Griffin feels that militant Islam treats women as second-class citizens.  But this would put him in the position of supporting women – and not hating them!

We at All about Margaret Hodge and the Barking and Dagenham Sentinel are a little old-fashioned.  We believe that web-sites, publications and interviews should try to raise standards of debate and provide detailed information, not just soundbites.

We’re about telling the truth.  We seek to inform and let people make up their own mind.  Hodge, on the other hand, seems to rely on lies and misinformation.

(1)  http://www.channel4.com/programmes/the-battle-for-barking/4od#3150944

January 9, 2011

Setting the scene for the Battle for Barking

Filed under: Battle for Barking — Patrick Harrington @ 6:16 pm
Tags:

SOME FOLKS may have seen The Battle for Barking, a thought-provoking film made by Laura Fairrie (1) for Channel 4. Made over the course of a year, it provides a reasonably in-depth look at how events panned out in Barking in relation to the May 2010 General Election. According to Channel 4:

“Long-standing Labour MP Margaret Hodge is a stalwart of the New Labour establishment. Running against her is Nick Griffin, the British National Party leader. Griffin is a controversial figure, with a conviction for inciting racial hatred, who nonetheless commands considerable support. As it chronicles the rise and fall of the far-right BNP, it gives a fascinating insight into the inner workings of the ‘BNP family’ and the working class disillusionment with the Labour party that fuelled the BNP campaign, offering an honest, moving and humorous portrait of a white working class community forced to face the changes brought by new immigrant populations.” (2) Although Hodge got herself re-elected, (3) Fairrie’s work was very interesting. For it revealed a lot of information about Margaret ‘Loads of Money’ Hodge, her inner circle of advisers, and the local Labour Party election machine. In the next few weeks, we’ll be producing a series of articles which will examine Hodge’s character in the light of The Battle for Barking. In particular, we’ll be highlighting the arrogance and hypocrisy of a multi-millionaire ‘Socialist’ who represents one of the poorest areas of the country. (We also hope to look at various other reviews – from right across the political spectrum – of Fairrie’s Channel 4 programme.)

For those who haven’t seen The Battle for Barking you can do so by clicking here: http://www.channel4.com/programmes/the-battle-for-barking/4od#3150944

After watching it, we’d encourage you to re-read this web-site and what The Barking and Dagenham Sentinel (4) had to say about Hodge. Make your own mind about her. Then ask yourself: Is she really the right person to represent this area – and does she deserve your future vote?

 (1) http://www.guardian.co.uk/tv-and-radio/video/2010/nov/30/documentary-documentary

 (2) http://www.channel4.com/programmes/the-battle-for-barking/4od#3150944

 (3) http://margaret-hodge.co.uk/

 (4) http://margarethodge.files.wordpress.com/2010/05/sentinel.pdf

Theme: Rubric. Blog at WordPress.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.